STATISTICS

Viewed0

Downloads 321

HTML Click0

You can copy the link to share it directly

The treatment of esophageal cancer in China: A review of recent progress

Esophageal Cancer   Issue: 2025 02期 Page: 74-86 Publish Date: 2023/05/16

Title:

Title:

The treatment of esophageal cancer in China: A review of recent progress

Author(s):

Author(s):

Ruinuo Jia1'2, Liuyan Li1·2, Manxi Sheng Bingyi Xu1·2, Xiaoyi Liu1'2, Shegan Gao1·2•

1. Cancer Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital and College  of Clinical Medicine of Herran University of Science and Tech­ nology, Luoyang, Herran 471000, China

2. Herran Key Laboratory of Cancer Epigenetics, Luoyang, Henan 471000, China

Keywords:

Keywords:

Esophagealcancer, Diagnosis, Treatment

CLC:

CLC:

DOI:

DOI:

Abstract:

Abstract:

As the high incidence area of esophageal squamouscellcarcino­ ma (ESCC), China accounts for the most of ESCC cases world­ wide. Unlike Westerncountries where esophagealcancer mainly refers to esophageal adenocarcinoma, the predominant  histotype of esophagealcancer in China is squamous cell  carcinom a, which composed more than 90% of esophagea l can cer nation­ wide and exhibited obvious regional differences. The application of endoscopicultrasonography, PET-CT, and MRI have been employed to accurately assess the stage  of  esophagealcancer. For the treatment of esoph ageal cancer, advanced technolog ies SUch as neoadjuvant / definitiveconcurrentchemoradiotherapy, minimally invasive surgery, and photodynamictherapy have im­ mensely improv ed the overall survival and quality of life. Addi­ tionally, immunotherapy has been achieved  remarkable  results for the treatment of advanced esophagealcancer over the last de­ cade. This review thus provides a detailed summary of the latest progress on the se aspects.

References:

References:

[ 1 ] Malhotra GK, Yanala U, Ravipati A, Follet M, Vijayakumar M, Are C. Global trends in esophageal cancer. J Surg Oneal 2017 ; 115: 564-79.

[2]] Chen W, Zheng R, Baade  PD,  et  al.  Cancer sta­ tistics in China, 2015. CA  Cancer J Clin 2016 ; 66: 115-32.

[3]] Liu ZC, Li ZX, Zhang Y, et al. Interpretation on the report of global  cancer  statistics  2020. ]. Multidiscip. Sci 2021; 7: 1-14.

[4]Thrift AP, Whiteman DC. The incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma continues to rise: analysis of period and birth cohort effects on re­ cent trends. Ann Oncol 2012; 23: 3155- 62.

[ 5 ] Yang S, Lin S, Li N, et al. Burden,  trends, and risk factors of esophageal cancer in China from 1990 to 2017: an up-to-date overview and com­ parison with those in Japan and South Korea. J Hematol Oncol 2020; 13: 146.

[ 6 ] Malik V, Johnston  C, 0'Toole D, et al. Metabol­ ic tumor volume provides complement ary prog­ nostic information to EUS staging in esophageal and junctional cancer. Dis Esophagus 2017; 30: 1-8.

[7]Old OJ, Isabelle M, Barr H. Staging early esoph­ ageal cancer. Adv Exp Med Biol 2016; 908: 161- 81.

[8]Luo LN, He LJ, Gao XY, et al. Endoscopic ultra­ sound for preoperative esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis. PLoS One 2016; 11: e0158373.

[ 9 ] He LJ, Xie C, Wang ZX, et al. Submucosal sa­ line injection followed by endoscopic ultrasound versus endoscopic ultrasound only for distin­ guishing between Tla and Tlb esophageal can­ cer. Clin Cancer Res 2020; 26: 384-90.

[ 10] Cao F, Chen G, Su W, et al. Endoscopic ultra­ sound-guided fine needle aspiration for smooth benign appearing malignant esophageal stric­ ture: a cross-sectional study. ] Thorac Dis 2022; 14: 2112-21.

[ 11] Sah BR , Owczarczyk K, Siddique M, Cook GJR, Goh V. Radiomics in esophageal and gas­ tric cancer. Abdom Radial 2019; 44: 2048-58.

[ 12] Purandare NC, Pramesh CS, Karimundackal G,[13] Lordick F, Mariette C, Haustermans K, Ober­ mannova R, Arnold D. Oesophageal cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagno­ sis, treatment and follow- up . Ann Oneal 2016; 27: v50-7.

[ 14] Goense L, Meziani J, van Rossum PSN, et al. Limited additional value of cervical ultrasonog­ raphy over a negative 18F-FDG PET/CT for di­ agnosing cervical lymph node metastases in pa­ tients with esophageal cancer: a systematic re­ view and meta-analysis. Nucl Med Commun 2018; 39: 645-51.

[ 15] Patel N, Foley KG, Powell AG, et al. Propensity score analysis of 18-FDG PET/ CT-enhanced staging in patients undergoing surgery for esophageal cancer. Eur] Nucl Med Mal !mag­ ing 2019; 46: 801-9.

[16]Liu S, Zhang Y, Chen L, et al. Whole-lesion apparent diffusion coefficient histogram analy­ sis: significance in T and N staging of gastric cancers. BMC Cancer 2017; 17: 665.

[ 17] Heethuis SE, Goense L,  van  Rossum  PSN,  et al. DW-MRI and DCE-MRI are of comple­ mentary value in predicting pathologic re­ sponse to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer. Acta Oneal 2018; 57: 1201-8.

[ 18] Borggreve AS, Mook S, Verheij M, et al. Preop­ erative image-guided identification of  response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in esopha­ geal cancer (PRIDE): a multicenter observa­ tional study. BMC Cancer 2018; 18: 1006.

[ 19 ] Guo J, Wang Z, Qin J, et al. A prospective anal­ ysis of the diagnostic accuracy of 3 T MRI, CT and endoscopic ultrasound for preoperative T staging of potentially resectable esophageal cancer. Cancer Imaging 2020; 20: 64.

[ 20 ] Chen YL, Li R, Chen TW, et al. Whole-tumourtog ram analysis of pharmacokinetic parame­ ters from dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in resectable oesophageal squamous cell carcino­ ma can predict T-stage and  regional  lymph node metastasis. Eur J Radial 2019; 112: 112-20.

[ 21 ] Malik V, Harmon M, Johnston C, et al. Whole body MRI in the staging of esophageal  cancer­ A prospective comparison with whole body 18F-FDG PET-CT. Dig Surg 2015; 32: 397-408.

[ 22] Naveed M, Kubiliun  N.  Endoscopic  treatment of early-stage esophageal cancer. Curr Oncol Rep 2018; 20: 71.

[ 23] Goense L, Meziani J, Borggreve AS, et al. Role of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy after endoscop­  ic treatment  of  early-stage  esophageal  cancer: a systematic review. Minerva Chir 2018; 73:428-36.

[24]] Inoue T, Ishihara  R.  Photodynamic  therapy for esophageal cancer. Clin Endosc 2021; 54: 494-8.

[25]] Wu H, Minamide T, Yano  T.  Role  of photody­ namic therapy in the treatment of esophageal cancer. Dig Endosc 2019; 31: 508-16.

[26]] Zhao S, Qi  W,  Chen  J.  Role  of  a multidisci­plinary team in administering radiotherapy for esophageal cancer. BMC Cancer 2020; 20:974.

[ 27 ] Watanabe M, Otake R, Kozuki R, et al. Recent progress in multidisciplinary treatment for pa­ tients with esophageal cancer. Surg Today 2020; 50: 12-20.

[28]] Sohda M, Kuwano H. Current  status  and future prospects for esophageal cancer Treatment. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2017; 23: 1-11.

[29]] Mayanagi S, lrino T, Kawakubo H, Kitagawa Y. Neoadjuvant treatment strategy  for  locally ad­ vanced thoracic esophageal cancer. Ann Castro­ enterol Surg 2019; 3: 269-75.

[30]Yang H, Liu H, Chen Y, et al. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery Versus surgery alone for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus (NEOCRTEC5010): A phase III multicenter, randomized, open-label clinical trial. J Clin Oneal 2018; 36: 2796-803.

[31]] Aadam AA, Abe S. Endoscopic submucosal dis­ section for superficial esophageal cancer. Dis Esophagus 2018; 31.

[ 32 ] Suzuki G, Yamazaki H, Aibe N, et al. Endo­ scopic submucosal dissection followed by chemoradiotherapy for superficial esophageal cancer: choice of new approach. Radiat Oneal 2018; 13: 246.

[ 33] Minashi K, Nihei K, Mizusawa J, et al. Efficacy of endoscopic resection and selective chemora­ diotherapy for stage  I  esophageal  squamous cell carcinoma. Gastroenterology 2019; 157: 382-390.e3.

[ 34] Davarzani N, Hutchins GGA, West NP, et al. Prognostic value of pathological lymph node status and primary tumour regression grading following neoadjuvant chemotherapy - results from the MRC OE02 oesophageal cancer trial. Histopathology 2018; 72: 1180-8.

[ 35] Yano T, Kasai H, Horimatsu T, et al. A multi­ center phase II study of salvage photodynamic therapy using  talaporfin  sodium (ME2906) and a diode laser (PNL6405EPG) for local failure after chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy for esophageal cancer. Oncotarget 2017; 8: 22135-44.

[ 36] Jing SW, Qin JJ, Liu Q, et al. Comparison of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and neoadju­ vant chemotherapy for esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis. Future Oneal 2019; 15: 2413-22.

[ 37 ] Zheng Y, Liu X, Zhang R, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with or without neoadjuvant ra­ diotherapy compared with neoadjuvant chemo­ radiotherapy for esophageal cancer. J Thorac Dis 2018; 10: 4715-23.

[ 38] Yang H, Liu H, Chen Y, et al. Long-term efficacy of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery for the treatment of locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: the NEOCRTEC5010 randomized clinical trial. ]A­ MA Surg 2021; 156: 721-9.

[39]Barbetta A, Hsu M, Tan KS, et al. Definitive chemoradiotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemo­ radiotherapy followed by surgery for stage II to III esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. J Tho­ rac Cardiovasc Surg  2018;  155:  2710-2721. e3.

[40]] Teoh AYE, Chiu PWY, Yeung  WK,  Liu SYW, Wong SKH, Ng EKW.  Long-term survival out­ comes after definitive chemoradiation versus  surgery   in   patients with resectable squamous carcinoma of the esophagus: results from a ran­ domized controlled trial. Ann Oneal 2013; 24: 165-71.

[41]] Jia RN, Shan  TY,  Zhou  FY,  et  al. Concurrent   chemoradiotherapy    of capecitabine   with   or without  oxaliplatin versus cisplatin  with  fluoro­ uracil  for treatment of squamous oesophageal cancer in Chinese patients (CRTCOESC): an interim report of  a  randomised,  open-label, multicentre trial. Lancet Oncolo 2017; 18: S4- S4.

[ 42 ] Kelly RJ. lmmunotherapy for esophageal and gastric cancer. Am Soc Clin Oneal Educ Book 2017; 37: 292-300.

[ 43] Fuchs CS, Doi T, Jang RW, et al. Safety and ef­ ficacy of pembrolizumab monotherapy in pa­ tients with previously treated advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer: phase 2 clinical KEYNOTE-059 trial. JAMA Oneal 2018; 4: el 80013.

[ 44 ] Hansen AR, Massard C, Ott PA, et al. Pembrolizumab for advanced prostate adenocarcinoma: findings of the KEYNOTE-028 study. Ann On­ col 2018; 29: 1807-13.

[45]] Shah MA, Kojima T,  Hochhauser  D,  et  al. Effi 一 cacy and safety of pembrolizumab for heavily pretreated patients with advanced, metastatic adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus: the phase 2 KEYNOTE-180 study. JAMA Oncol 2019; 5: 546-50.

[46]] De  Mello  RA,  Lordick F,  Muro  K, Janjigian YY. Current and future aspects of immunother­ apy for esophageal and gastric malignancies. Am Soc Clin Oneal Educ Book 2019; 39: 237-

[47]Kato K, Doki Y, Ura T, et al. Long-term effica­ cy and predictive correlates of response to niv­ olumab in Japanese patients with esophageal cancer. Cancer Sci 2020; 111: 1676-84.

[48]] Huang J, Xu  B,  Mo  H,  et  al.  Safety, activity, and biomarkers of SHR-1210, an anti-PD-1  antibody, for  patients   with advanced esopha­ geal   carcinoma.   Clin Cancer Res 2018; 24: 1296-304.

[49]] Wang X, Zhang B, Chen  X, et al.  Lactate dehy­ drogenase and baseline  markers associated with clinical outcomes of advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients treated with camrelizumab  (SHR-1210),  a novel  anti-PD-1  antibody.  Thorac  Cancer 2019; 10: 1395-401.

[50]] Xu  J,  Zhang  Y,  Jia  R,  et  al.  Anti-PD-1 anti­  body SHR-1210   combined   with Apatinib  for advanced  hepatocellular carcinoma, gastric, or esophagogastric junction cancer: An open-la­ bel, dose escalation and expansion study. Clin Cancer Res. 2019; 25: 515-23.

 下载信息  [文件大小:8631 KB 下载次数: 次]
点击下载文件:ThetreatmentofesophagealcancerinChinaAreviewofrecentprogress.pdf


Memo:

Memo: