STATISTICS

Viewed0

Downloads 253

HTML Click0

You can copy the link to share it directly

The perspectives of barriers and enablers in implementingnon-tube no fasting”-enhanced recovery system after esophagectomy

Esophageal Cancer   Issue: 2025 02期 Page: 52-58 Publish Date: 2023/05/16

Title:

Title:

The perspectives of barriers and enablers in implementingnon-tube no fasting”-enhanced recovery system after esophagectomy

Author(s):

Author(s):

Yin Li* 

Department of Thoracic Surgery, National Cancer Center, Na­tional Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Cancer Hospi­tal, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100000 China 

Keywords:

Keywords:

Esophagctomy, Enhanced recopery after surgery, Esophageeal cancer

CLC:

CLC:

DOI:

DOI:

Abstract:

Abstract:

The dreadful suffering of thoracic gastric conduit-related com­ plications after an esophagectomy has always driven surgeons on the frontlines to seek novel and efficient strategies towards de­ veloping a sustainable program known as Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS). Among the conventional approaches to ERAS such as refining surgical operations, optimizing the reha­ bilitation procedures, and minimizing nutritional risks, the earli­ er resumption of food intake orally and minimization of tubes for drainage are increasingly recognized due to the apparent bene­ fits they bring to patients. With an in-depth understanding of natural feeding strategies and the innovations and improvements of relevant techniques, "none tube no fasting (NTNF)" mode is starting to be accepted by mainstream medical workers world­ wide. The author here timely summarizes and discusses the evo­ lution of the feeding strategy after esophageal surgery with a spe­ cific focus on the origin and development of NTNF. Notwith­ standing the various challenges of the current treatment regimen, the accumulation of first-hand experience, advancements of new technologies, and the combined strategies of multimodality treatments including ESD and EMR, will allow the NTNF-ERAS system to gradually be perfected. Through this will be ushered a new era of esophageal surgery, al­ lowing it to reach new heights and ultimately benefit the wellbeing of esophageal cancer patients across the globe.


References:

References:

[ 1 ] Raymond DP, Seder CW, Wright CD, et al.  Pre­ 如 tors of major morb 心 ty or mortality after re­ section for esophageal cancer: A society of tho­ racic surgeons general thoracic surgery database risk adjustment model. Ann Thorac Surg 2016; 102: 207-14.

[ 2] Schroder W, Raptis DA, Schmidt HM, et al. Anastomotic techniques and associated morbidi­ ty in total minimally invasive transthoracic esophagectomy: Results from the EsoBench­ mark database. Ann Surg 2019; 270: 820-6.

[3] Preston SR, Markar SR, Baker CR, et al. Impact of a multidisciplinary standardized clinical path­ way on perioperative outcomes in patients with oesophageal cancer. Br J Surg 2013; 100: 105-12.

[4] Ljungqvist 0, Scott M, Fearon KC. Enhanced re­ covery after surgery: A review. JAMA Surg 2017; 152: 292-8.

[5] Gan TJ, Scott M, Thacker J, Hedrick T, Thiele

RH, Miller TE. American society for enhanced recovery: Advancing enhanced recovery and perioperative medicine. Anesth  Analg  2018; 126: 1870-3.

[6] Sun HB, Liu XB, Zhang RX, et al. Early oral feeding following thoracolaparoscopic oesopha­ gectomy for oesophageal cancer. Eur J Cardio­ thorac Surg 2015; 47: 227-33.

[7] ] Zheng Y, Li Y, Liu X, et al.  Feasibility  of  a sin­ gle mediastinal  drain  through   the abdominal wall after esophagectomy. Medicine (Baltimore) 2018; 97: el3234.

[8] ] Sun H, Li Y, Liu X, et al.  Feasibility  of  "no tube no fasting" therapy in thoracolaparoscopic oe­ sophagectomy for patients with oesophageal can­ cer. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi 2014; 17: 898-901.

[9] ] Wischmeyer PE, Carli F, Evans DC, et al. Ameri­ can society for enhanced recovery and periopera­ tive quality initiative joint consensus statement on nutrition screening and therapy within a surgi­ cal enhanced recovery pathway. Anesth Analg 2018; 126: 1883-95.

[ 10] Ellis H. Franz Torek (1861-1938): First suc­ cessful resection of an oesophageal tumour. Br J Hosp Med (Lond) 2008; 69: 529.

[ 11] Torek F. The operative treatment of carcinma of the oesophagus. Ann Surg 1915; 61: 385-405.

[12] ] Siewert JR. History of the  treatment  of esopha­ geal  cancer.  Esophagus  2010;  7: 183-8.

[13] ] Hurt R. Surgical treatment  of  carcinoma  of the oesophagus. Thorax 1991; 46: 528-35.

[ 14] Gerndt SJ, Orringer MB. Tube  jejunostomy  as an adjunct to esophagectomy. Surgery 1994; 115: 164-9.

[ 15] Lassen K, Kjaeve J, Fetveit T, et al. Allowing normal food at will after major upper gastroin­ testinal surgery does not increase morbidity: a randomized multicenter trial. Ann Surg 2008; 247: 721-9.

[ 16] Jianjun Q, Yin L, Wenqun X, et al. Fast track

program for esophagectomy patients. Thorac Cancer 2012; 3: 55-9.

[ 17] Eberhard KE, Achiam MP, Rolff HC, et al. Comparison of "Nil by Mouth" versus  early oral intake in three different diet regimens fol­ lowing esophagectomy. World J Surg 2017; 41: 1575-83.

[ 18] Speicher JE,  Gunn TM, Rossi  NP, et al.  Delay in oral feeding is associated with a decrease in anastomotic leak following transhiatal esopha­ gectomy. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2018; 30: 476-84.

[ 19] Mahmoodzadeh H, Shoar S, Sirati F, et al.  Ear­ ly initiation of oral feeding following upper gas­ trointestinal tumor surgery: a randomized con­ trolled trial. Surg Today 2015; 45: 203-8.

[ 20] Sun HB, Li Y, Liu XB, et al. Early oral feeding following McKeown minimally invasive esopha­ gectomy: An open-label, randomized, con­ trolled, noninferiority trial. Ann  Surg  2018; 267: 435-42.

[ 21] Sun HB, Li Y, Liu XB, et al. Impact of an early oral feeding protocol on inflammatory cytokine changes after esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 2019; 107: 912-20.

[22] ] Berkelmans GHK,  Fransen  LFC, Dolmans­ Zwartjes ACP, et al. Direct oral feeding Fol­ lowing minimally invasive esophagectomy (NUTRIENT II trial): An international, multi­ center, open-label randomized controlled tri­ al. Ann Surg 2020; 271: 41-7.

[23] Sun HB, Li Y, Liu XB, et al. Embedded threelayer esophagogastric anastomosis reduces mor­ bidity and improves short-term outcomes after esophagectomy for cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 2016; 101: 1131-8.

[24] ] Zheng Y, Li  Y,  Wang  Z, Sun  H,  Zhang  R. A video  demonstration of  the  Li's anastomosis­  the key  part  of  the   "non-tube no fasting" fast track program for resectable esophageal carci­ noma. J Thorac Dis 2015; 7: 1264-8.

[25] ] Yan M,  Li Y, Qin J, et al.  Comparison  of intra­

thoracic gastric emptying before and after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Chinese

Journal of Clinical  Oncology  2011;  38:  452-4. [ 26 ] Zhu Z, Li Y, Zheng Y, et al. Chewing 50 times

per bite could help to resume oral feeding  on  the first postoperative day following minimally invasive oesophagectomy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2018; 53: 325-30.

[ 27 ] Triantafyllou T, Olson MT, Theodorou D, et al. Enhanced recovery pathways vs standard care pathways in esophageal cancer surgery: system­ atic review and  meta-analysis.  Esophagus 2020; 17: 100-12.


Memo:

Memo: